Single-sex verses co-educational schools

Single-sex verses co-educational schools

Whilst the majority of schools in the UK are co-educational, there are a number of state and independent schools that offer single-sex education.

We are commonly asked about the pros and cons of single-sex education verses a co-educational experience.

Here are two different perspectives on the less traditional form of education, single-sex education.

 Pros:

1. Academic outcomes: For some, Oxbridge places or GCSE and A Level exams results are seen as the gold standard of success. It is telling that the ‘best’ schools in this regard are overwhelmingly single-sex.
2. Boys and girls learn in different ways: Successfully teaching boys and girls can, surprisingly, require a very different tool kit. A competitive, lively classroom can be very beneficial for some boys, particularly those less inclined to engage without a sense of competition. On the other hand, topic-based learning and project-based learning can be a very appealing way of learning for girls.
3. Increased confidence: Some children may feel more comfortable expressing themselves and participating actively in class discussions without the fear of judgment from the opposite sex; this is particularly the case for girls. Furthermore, without the presence of the opposite sex, children may feel less pressure to conform to traditional gender stereotypes, allowing for greater exploration in subjects, such as Drama, English, and the Performing Arts for boys, or science, engineering, and technology for girls.
4. Distractions and peer pressure: Some argue that the presence of the opposite sex in the classroom may lead to distractions and peer pressure, potentially affecting academic performance and focus, or provides opportunities for problems to occur outside the classroom.

Cons:

1. Inconvenient for families: For those with boys and girls, a co-educational school is often more convenient rather than having children at different schools.
2. Limited socialisation: The limited opportunity for social interaction with the opposite sex may hinder the development of social skills and ability to work collaboratively in mixed environments later in life.
3. Imbalance in extracurriculars: Single-sex schools may struggle to offer a wide range of extracurricular activities if their facilities are built with one sex in mind, e.g. a lack of Food Technology in a school for boys, or no football provision in a school for girls.
4. It isn’t real life: It is hard to get away from the fact that life is co-educational!

We find that families typically have very strong, clear views on single-sex verses co-educational schools. These are largely based upon the parents’ experience of education themselves, and ultimately, the decision between single-sex and co-educational schools typically comes down to what is best for the child's individual needs, preferences, and values.

Another way? The diamond method

 Whilst it can be a timetabler’s nightmare, some schools adopt a diamond model, where children in a co-educational school are taught in single-sex lessons for key subjects, such as English, maths, and science, or in activities such as swimming. As such, these schools claim to provide the benefits of both single-sex education within the classroom, whilst providing a positive social experience for both sexes.

Could this be a significant feature of 21^st century education moving forwards?

ESB Consulting

ESB Consulting is a Family and Education Consultancy. We offer complementary discovery calls to allow you to find out more about our services.

Sign up today for unlimited access:

• Book appointments
• Expert advice & tips
• Premium videos & audio
• Curated parenting newsletters
• Chat with your bloss community
• Discounts & competitions
• Special events